film review by Jon Reinsch
Old Movie, New Relevance
The Battle of Algiers, directed by Gillo Pontecorvo
If you spend much time in movie theaters, cinema
becomes one of the resources you use to make sense of the world.
That’s true even of events on the scale of September 11. In its
aftermath, I looked into the pool of my cinematic past. A film came
floating up to the surface that I hadn’t seen in some 30 years: The
Battle of Algiers.
Gillo Pontecorvo directed this gritty film in 1965. In semidocumentary
style, it covers part of the 1954-1962 Algerian revolution, leading to
the end of French colonial rule and the founding of the Algerian
state. With dynamic close-ups and zooms, and music by the director
himself in collaboration with spaghetti-western composer Ennio
Morricone, Pontecorvo creates an immediate experience.
For the record, I consider the World Trade Center attacks to be
profoundly evil, and I’m not equating bin Laden with anyone in the
Algerian independence movement. But to understand, one must resist the
impulse to see the world in black and white. Thus, it is useful to
observe the parallels that a post-9/11 viewing of this film
suggest.
Two characters stand out. On the Algerian side there is Ali La Pointe,
a petty criminal. While in prison he witnesses a man being led to the
guillotine shouting “Long live Algeria!” The experience converts him
to the cause of the National Liberation Front. Ali is all anger, the
kind of man who could become an ardent follower of bin Laden.
Nevertheless, all it takes is one tracking close-up to make us care
about him—and feel his rage.
Intent on destroying the NLF is the charismatic Colonel Mathieu. A
more complex character than Ali, Mathieu is a veteran of the WWII
French Resistance. Perhaps that’s why he can express admiration for
the courage of his adversaries, who share with the Resistance the use
of terror against an occupying force. When questioned by the press, he
says “Those who call us Nazis may not know some of us survived Dachau
and Buchenwald.” Mathieu apparently believes that his righteous past
proves the correctness of his present mission. But he also waves off
ethical considerations entirely with “We are soldiers. Our duty is to
win.”
As The Battle of Algiers opens, it is 1957, but the film
quickly flashes back to the beginnings of the conflict. Before
striking out against the French, the NLF decrees an effort at internal
purification within the Algerian community—rooting out vices. Children
gang up on an alcoholic, and Ali kills a pimp—although he seems to
have been a former patron. It’s chillingly reminiscent of the
puritanical Taliban.
In the next stage, the NLF carries out a series of killings of
policemen. The French retaliate with explosives, and things quickly
escalate. There is at least one suicide attack. Fear leads to a surge
of so-called patriotism among the colonials, shouting “Hurray for the
paratroops!” Then as now, hatred of Arabs and Moslems flares up, and
people are harassed for their ethnicity alone. Some advocate genocide,
yelling “Kill all the bastards off; then we’ll have peace.”
In an astoundingly intense sequence, three Algerian women plant bombs
in crowded public places. Exploiting the racism of the French that saw
Arabs as dangerous, these women disguise themselves as Europeans to
get past the checkpoints. The North African rhythms on the soundtrack
evoke a kind of ritual. We may admire these women’s courage and
ingenuity. But, glimpsing the faces of the people who will die in the
blasts, we’re horrified.
Both sides strive to win the people over. We hear NLF communiques
alternate with loudspeakers blaring propaganda like “France is your
country.” Soldiers hand out bread in the Casbah, but it’s mostly
rejected.
In this film, the press show less deference to authority than our own
flag-waving anchormen. Over the years, we gather, opposition to the
Algerian War has grown at home. One reporter asks about the use of
torture. Mathieu is unapologetic, saying “To succumb to humane
considerations only leads to hopeless chaos.” Our own FBI may be
moving toward this view. Faced with suspects who won’t talk, they’re
considering deporting them to countries with fewer constitutional
restrictions on their police—France, for example.
This film prompts a question without easy answers: can terrorism be
justified? Ali and Mathieu have no doubts, but we must, especially
because, by an objective definition of the term, we’re now engaged in
it. An NLF leader observes in the film that “it’s later, when we’ve
won, that the real difficulties will begin.” His prescience was borne
out by history; the film’s release coincided with Algeria’s first
coup. Tragedies continue to play out there today. And though our
revolution was won long ago, American democracy has rarely seemed so
fragile.
The Battle of Algiers is not currently playing on any local
screens. Perhaps a smart programmer will add it to their schedule
soon. In the meantime, see it on video.
|