Did Bayer Prevent Generic Version of Anti-Anthrax Drug Cipro?
The following article is by the German group CBG/Coordination
against BAYER-dangers. The group has been monitoring the Bayer Corp.
for more than 20 years.
Did the Bayer Corporation pay other pharmaceutical manufacturers not
to manufacture generic versions of Cipro, a brandname for the
prescription antibiotic ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, which is used
against anthrax?
Gilman and Pastor, LLP, is prosecuting a nationwide class action on
behalf of all persons or entities in the US who purchased and/or paid
for Cipro at any time since Jan. 8, 1997.
“We allege that beginning on Jan. 8, 1997, Bayer AG entered into
unlawful and anti-competitive agreements with Barr Laboratories, Inc.
and Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. under which, in exchange for over $50
million per year, Barr and Hoechst Marion Roussel agreed not to
manufacture or market a generic version of Cipro. These agreements
allowed Bayer to maintain a monopoly over the ciprofloxacin market”
and to charge super-high prices for the drug, the suit alleges. “As a
result of the unlawful agreements, Plaintiffs and the Class have been
deprived of the ability to purchase generic ciprofloxacin at a
competitive price.”
Price comparisons for a 500 mg tablet of Ciprofloxacin in US dollars
as of October 21, 2001 show the following: US Bayer wholesale 4.67; US
Bayer best federal government 1.83; Canada Bayer/government 1.58;
South Africa/government 2.10; India generic 3 cents; Poland Bayer
1.51; Poland Polfa Grodzisk generic 29 cents.
In response to the drastic price differences between what Bayer
charges and what the generic price could be, consumer activist and
Green Party presidential candidate Ralph Nader and his associate James
Love sent the following letter to Health and Human Services Secretary
Tommy Thompson:
“Dear Secretary Thompson:
“We were shocked by your comments in the October 17, 2001
Washington Post, indicating that you do not have the legal
authority to authorize generic production of ciprofloxacin, a drug
used to treat victims of an anthrax attack. This, of course, is not
true. As your own staff is well aware, you may use 28 USC 1498 to
issue compulsory licenses for patents, and you could immediately
authorize the five companies who have already satisfied US FDA
requirements for the quality of their products to speed the
manufacturer of ciprofloxacin, and indeed this could and should be
done for any other medicine needed to confront the current
crisis.…
“Bayer, the giant German pharmaceutical firm, currently markets
ciprofloxacin on an exclusive basis in the US. Drug stores are
charging in some cases more than $700 for a two month’s supply of
medicine that can be obtained for as little as $20 in some foreign
county generic markets, and now it seeks to be the exclusive company
that can supply 1.2 billion pills to the federal government. Bayer
stands to make hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars in the
wake of the September 11 terrorist attack on Americans.
“In the absence of adequate government stockpiles, families who cannot
afford the hundreds of dollars per month per family member for
ciprofloxacin risk not having access to this product, should the need
arise. This is an unethical and unnecessary form of rationing. Some
government officials and those who can afford the high prices have
secure supplies of ciprofloxacin. It is your duty to see that all
taxpayers and especially those who are less affluent are protected,
and are protected as soon as is possible, not as soon as it is
possible for one firm, Bayer, to supply the market. And it would make
sense to have redundant sources of supply, for all of the obvious
reasons….
“Your official responsibility is to protect the public’s health, and
not to defend large profiteering pharmaceutical companies, which are
already making a fortune because of our country’s current problems.
How do you define the patriotic choice here?”
CBG/Coordination against BAYER-dangers, Postfach 15 04 18, 40081
Duesseldorf, Germany. E-mail: CBGnetwork@aol.com; www.CBGnetwork.org;
Fax: (+49) 211-333-940 Tel: (+49) 211-333-911.
|