The Real Vulnerability of the US: Fear of Deep Relationships
opinion by Doug Collins, The Free Press
The US government’s practice of forging temporary
international alliances has proved to be a costly gaffe, which has
produced short-term gains but long-term setbacks in our stature and
domestic safety. The cause of our repeated failings in international
relations comes from our fear of creating deep and meaningful
relationships. It’s important to realize that this fear hampers our
domestic life as well.
One example of international scale is that the US aided Afghanistan
during the war against the atheist Soviet Union, an easy enemy for
devout Muslims. As soon as the Soviet threat was beaten, the US pulled
out, leaving the shattered country with only a trickle of humanitarian
aid. In his post-attack video release, bin Laden explicitly stated his
feeling of being abandoned by the US.
Of course no one likes to be a tool. If you thought someone was your
ally, but then you found he/she was a friend of convenience, you might
feel spiteful. If you had violent tendencies, you might be dangerous.
This explains a major facet of bin Laden and the Afghan leaders.
Although some may condone US shifts-of-allegiance for strategic
reasons, such behavior is frowned upon in other cultures. As one
Indian friend told me, “In India, if I talk with you now, I’ll always
talk with you. We don’t have fleeting alliances like in the US.”
On a domestic level, our same unwillingness to forge deeper
relationships applies. After all, what allowed the September 11
terrorists to operate so freely in the US, renting houses, exercising
in gyms, going to strip bars and taking flight classes? They operated
without encumbrance because nobody really cared about them as long as
they were spending money. If the Americans around them had really
cared about them, then someone might have caught on to their
destructive (and self-destructive) plans. If they had been smothered
with neighborly concern here, they might have instead 1) left, unable
to fulfill their plans, 2) been caught before the plans were brought
to devastating fruition, or 3) defected and become good Americans. A
caring social network in our cities and towns is much better and far
cheaper than any FBI wiretapping campaign, and much easier for privacy
advocates to swallow.
But it’s not just terrorism that can be minimized by a more neighborly
atmosphere. It’s also petty crime, domestic violence, poverty, and
other social ills. In our culture, which has become largely unsocial,
it’s really no surprise that anti-social behavior flourishes.
I’ve found that many professed peace-lovers are part of the problem.
Recently, I had an open-house party for neighbors. I had particularly
hoped one of my more progressive-minded neighbors would come and get
to know the others, but he didn’t show. Days later, I happened to see
him on the bus. He said, “Sorry I couldn’t come. It was such an
intense day for me with the starting of the bombing.” He had spent
October 6 glued to the TV instead of taking the opportunity to meet
his neighbors. He could have instead read the daily papers the next
day.
Just as the US military prefers to bomb from a distance, we
Americans—of all political stripes—largely prefer to relate to each
other from a distance as well. The result is that our problems will
not vanish, but may only increase with time.
The only development that will create lasting world peace is that
humanity—especially we Americans—will undergo a general change in
outlook, a change toward neighborliness and tolerance, and an
understanding that aggression is a natural feeling but should not be
translated into rash violence. Seeking an international, cooperative
police effort at apprehending bin Laden and other terrorists would be
an extremely positive first step toward forging a wider and more
sincere group of international friends. The current destructive
bombing of Afghanistan and hasty relationship with the Northern
Alliance will be far more expensive in terms of dollars and lives, and
will not solve the underlying problems. Even if Bush succeeds in
dropping a bomb right on top of bin Laden’s head, this conflict will
continue for years because of our lack of looking at ourselves.
What can advocates for positive change do to encourage the kind
of social life this country needs, so we can start moving out of our
unhealthy cycle as both a victim and perpetrator of violence? Here’s a
few ideas:
1. Don’t get obsessed by TV news or minute-to-minute reporting. Read
the papers tomorrow.
2. Go to parties when you’re invited, and talk about a variety of
topics of concern to others, not just about your own concerns or
viewpoints.
3. Have a party yourself, plan fun activities, and encourage people to
stay late. Mention politics only at the right time.
4. Introduce yourself to neighbors, and ask them friendly
questions.
5. Get to know immigrants from other countries. They have extremely
interesting stories to tell and often appreciate practicing English.
6. Have opinions, but listen with an open mind to others of different
opinion. If you disagree with someone, at least try to understand
them.
7. When you move, consider moving to a denser area, where you can live
closer to neighbors and friends. Suburban sprawl and widely detached
houses can be very isolating. Encourage denser development and
neighborhood designs that promote neighborliness.
8. Ride the bus and talk with the regulars.
9. Be dependable. Offer help to acquaintances when you sense they
might need it. Do what you say you’ll do.
10. When there is a war, realize that life goes on. Don’t feel
personally responsible for the war. Do what you can to create peace,
but don’t burn yourself out and ignore your social life. Be patient.
Concentrate on the root causes rather than the superficial causes of
war. Recognize that human consciousness cannot be changed
overnight.
11. Turn off your computer. Get out and talk to people at least once a
day. Phone conversations are preferable to email dodgeball.
12. Don’t try to act cool. “Cool” is often just another word for
“lonely”. Try being warm instead.
|