Regulars
Reader Mail
Envirowatch
Rad Videos
MediaBeat
Nature Doc
Reel Underground
Features
Dopey Decision
Supreme Court overrules medical and public opinion
by Sean Carter, contributor
Feds Kill Buffalo, Terrorize Bald Eagles
opinion by Buffalo Folks, contributors
Gandhista Holds City of Seattle Accountable
Injury lawsuit makes progress in wake of WTO crackdown
personal account by Swaneagle Harijan
Gene Giants Get Nasty
Flaws in genetic engineering are exposed
opinion by Ronnie Cummins, contributor
Women Demonstrate Against Dow
An ounce of prevention beats a pound of dioxin
Protest Frankentrees in Portland
by the GE-Tree Conference
Immigrants: ‘Them’ Is ‘Us’
opinion by Domenico Maceri, contributor
Unions, Immigrants Need Each Other
story and photos by David Bacon, contributor
Water Treatment
Sanctions deny even water to Iraqi citizens, but US peace workers pitch in
story and photos by Vickie Goodwin, contributor
Bombings Continue, and Public Health Conditions are Set to Worsen in Iraq
opinion by Ruth Wilson
Weapons Expert Blasts Bush's Missile 'Defense'
by Bob Hicks, contributor
Kent and Jackson, 1970
The real heroes were soldiers who organized against the war
opinion by Mike Alewitz, contributor
Changing the World, One Cup at a Time
by Nina Luttinger and Jeremy Simer, TransFair USA
'Shame Ads' Shame Shuttle Express Instead
Should a company replace your best friends?
opinion by Doug Collins
A Call to Arms
Non-consumers are a threat to the Corporate States of America
by Glenn Reed
|
|
|
Medical opinion by John F. Ruhland, ND
Do you have health-related questions for Dr. John, the Naturopathic
Doctor? Send them to the Free Press at 1463 E Republican #178, Seattle
WA 98112, or email to WAfreepress@gmail.com. Please keep questions short.
The opinions expressed below are on general issues of health. They
should not be construed as personal medical advice. Readers should
seek a variety of information about any health concern before deciding
on a treatment from a personal physician.
Mammography: Is There an Alternative?
Many Naturopaths and even some conventional physicians have mixed
feelings about the use of X-ray mammography as a cancer-screening
test. Some researchers are convinced that compressing breasts for
mammography ruptures cysts and disseminates cancer cells into the
bloodstream. Animal studies have proven this phenomenon, showing that
tumor compression can increase the spread of the cancer to other parts
of the body by up to 80 percent. A Swedish study showed that nearly 30
percent more cases of breast cancer occurred in women who had been
subjected to routine mammograms for ten years compared with those
women never receiving mammograms. Mammography does improve the
accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis, although it is not necessarily
the most accurate test.
In a German study, 54 percent of cases were correctly diagnosed by
obtaining a clinical history and performing a breast examination. The
number increased to 76 percent when mammography was added. When
computerized regulation thermography was used, the accuracy of
diagnosis rose to 92 percent.
Thermoregulation testing has been widely used by European physicians
for over twenty years. One form employs an infrared camera. Hot spots
showing up in breast tissue are areas of increased circulation. These
invariably are trouble areas. A newer technology—Computerized
Regulation Thermography—was approved by the FDA for use as a cancer
screening test in 1999. Computerized Thermography can be performed
annually with no risk to the patient. Trouble areas can be further
investigated using ultrasound, MRI, or X-ray mammography.
Although my office has the only Computerized Thermography unit in
Seattle, it is my hope that every physician’s office will have one
within ten years. For further information on thermography, please send
a self-addressed stamped envelope to me c/o the Free Press, and
I will get the information to you.
|